The LR3 'controversy' boils down (as I see it) to two main issues:
1. Off-Road: LR3 is
clearly disadvantaged. Difficult to argue otherwise (despite some positive press,,mostly by LR). I don't mean dirt roads,,, I mean off-road. A double whammy: 1) Suspension system impossible to upgrade (must be replaced to modify). 2) No all terrain or off-road tire option even in stock size. (stock tires inadequate for off-road use). Plus,,,, tougher break-over (although not quite as bad as H2) & lack of after-market accessories. Additionally, many LR "purists" dislike the Ford 'boxy' look,, and feel the LR3 lacks the true LR "spirit".
2. Most people's reality: LR3 is clearly a step-up in luxury. It's bigger, with a high-tech dash. Rides smoother & with more power than previous renditions of Disco.
Reality is that sales of LR3 will help keep LR is business,,,which in the interests of everyone. Rather than an either-or, I wish LR would give both camps what they want. We already have the new Rangie & LR3,,, how about getting back into making off-road vehicles. Apparently senior management thinks there is no market,,, but look at Jeep Rubicon,,, and the persistence of the standard Jeep. It exists side-by-side with Liberty & Grand Cherokee. Not to make Chrysler out to be a model of corporate decision-making, but you know what I mean....... thoughts?
