Land Rover Forum / Range Rover Forum Land Rover Forum Header Right
Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Sponsors

Sponsors

Go Back   Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

   

View Single Post
Old 10-31-2007, 10:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
roverandom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Alberta,Canada.
Posts: 373
Gallery: 0
Default

The particulars of any one accident do not prove or disprove anything. That is why there are 'standard' tests (not the BSOLDC, I mean front impact etc) to measure the performance of the veh in question.

I once worked with a guy that claimed to been in a 100mph wreck, did not have a seat belt on, was thrown clear of his car (out the door) and suffered only a small cut on chin. The car was totaled, he even showed us all pictures he took after the wreck. As a result he now thinks that seat belts are over rated and not really needed.

This one wreck and its happy outcome would not convince me (or you) to abandon the use seat belts and take commando rolling lessons for when we get thrown from our cars in the event of a accident.

Time to call a spade a spade, I love Defenders, but i am sorry to say they are very unsafe. The only good point about them (safety wise) is that they don't go very fast so unless you get one up to speed on the motorway (highway) nearly all you accidents will be at low speed.
__________________
"Your only supposed to blow the BLOODY DOORS OFF" The Italian job 1969.
roverandom is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content is copyright © 2004-2008 www.landroversonly.com and its original authors. Land Rovers Only is in no way affiliated with Land Rover