![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Half Moon Bay, CA
Posts: 60
Gallery:
0
|
Here's a link to the US Land Rover LR2 introduction.
http://www.landroverusa.com/us/en/Ve...2/overview.htm There's a lot of information here if you take the time go go through it. Among the interesting items are: No diesel in the US Six speed automatic tranny on the 3.2 litre inline 6 - no mention of lo range Coil spring on strut independent suspension all around Four wheel disk brakes Electronically controlled center diff with adaptive locking A whole lot of electronics in the drive line: ABS, 4ETC, HDC, stability control, roll-over mitigation Four position "Terrain Response" Approach and departure angles > 30 degrees Greater than 8 inch minimum ground clearance Lots of luxury amenities - will be interesting to see how they spread out over the trim levels I kind of like it. Although it won't be a hard core off-roader, I think it will be a better all around expedition/road trip vehicle than the original Freelander. That gold color is the last one I would choose, however. I can hardly wait to test drive it!! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 110
Gallery:
0
|
There is no low range - so if I want to buy a capable offroader that is also comfortable I will have to buy a Discovery 3 which is now priced outside the reach of the average person. If it had low range I would buy but now looks like I will have to buy a Jeep Cherokee - the only half decent diesel offroader that is not japanese at a reasonable price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Half Moon Bay, CA
Posts: 60
Gallery:
0
|
I'm not going to dismiss it for the lack of low range until I have a chance to drive it and to find out what the gear ratios are. The six-speed tranny could have a lower 1st than current. IIRC the 1st gear ratio in the current Freelander is about the same as lo-second in a Disco. Also there is more power available from the petrol engine and the inline 6 may have more torque at lower rpm than the V6. Time will tell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 110
Gallery:
0
|
Quote:
To answer your question - I doubt it Garry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The North Coast, USA
Posts: 4
Gallery:
0
|
I would like a more severe step to the rear roof, and a vertical C-pillar. I think the current Freelander has classic styling (all business) that will still look up to date in 20 years, whereas the current styling trend might turn out to be just that.
__________________
2002 Freelander HSE |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Believe
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|