![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kansas City MO
Posts: 19
Gallery:
0
|
In May I'm moving from Kansas City to Providence. The problem is that I have to get both vehicles out there. I have a mildly modified 95D1 and my wife drives a '00 DII stock. We don't want to drive both trucks separately if that can be avoided; besides getting killed on gas, we'd like to be together for the 1500 miles. Does anyone have any advice on how to pull this off? Is there a pretty reasonable way to have one disco tow the other? Piggyback? Has anyone ever tried shipping a vehicle--probably also pricey? Any advice would be appreciated. Moving is expensive enough, so cheaper is also better.
__________________
2000 Disco II 1995 Disco I |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
2004 Discovery II driver
|
shipping a vehicle is only a few hundred usually. i think i was qouted $572 to ship an FJ cruiser from texas to florida.
i think if you disconnect the front driveshaft and leave the vehicle in nuetral you can town it on a uhaul style car hauler. but i'm not positive.
__________________
![]() 2004 Discovery II SE7 - My Ride 2006 LR3 SE - Dad's Ride |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Rocky Mountain High
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 9,958
Gallery:
0
|
Look into renting from U-haul, check straps after the first few miles then check when you get gas. You should be fine as long as you remove the rear driveshaft from the 95 (I would pull with the DII)!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kansas City MO
Posts: 19
Gallery:
0
|
Those pictures are great. The piggyback could work. I am going to call Uhaul and see what they have. I was worried that their trailers may have weight limits, hopefully not.
__________________
2000 Disco II 1995 Disco I |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Rocky Mountain High
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 9,958
Gallery:
0
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,351
Gallery:
0
|
If you are going that far, I would invest in the flat bed hauler (uhaul has them). Less wear and tear on the truck, easier to manouver, don't have to drop the driveshaft.... Also, check the states regs that you are travelling through, I know that here in Canada, there are some that will not let you tow a vehicle of similar size and weight. (due to the fact that you are doubling the inertia but not the braking power and as well, the tow vehicle may not have the mass to control the towed vehicle....) Usually tho a flat bed gets you around this as the trailer should have electric brakes.....
__________________
Andrew Barr. 1972 Series III 109. "the Tin Turtle" "However, that was his ploy and I caved....totally caved... LOL!" Jellijo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,486
Gallery:
0
|
Is everyone posting here forgetting that Grover has a tow rating of 5500 pounds. You are encouraging him to damage his vehicle. Sure, what Fun did is possible, and is okay for a short trip, maybe even a couple of hundred miles. And it is correct that a flat bed trailer is better. But the truck, even on a tow dolly is over the rating. And it is MOST LIKELY that something will get damaged.
Since they both have the same tow rating, if you decide this is the way you want to go; use the 95 since it is the older vehicle. The DII will be more expensive to repair. Good luck.
__________________
"In certain places, at certain hours, gazing at the sea is dangerous. It is what looking at a woman sometimes is." - Victor Hugo |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Rocky Mountain High
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 9,958
Gallery:
0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,486
Gallery:
0
|
Fun; what's your RRC weigh? On a truckstop scale, my DII weighs in at over 6000 without all of the offroad kit that I bring when I offroad.
__________________
"In certain places, at certain hours, gazing at the sea is dangerous. It is what looking at a woman sometimes is." - Victor Hugo |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,486
Gallery:
0
|
There's just no way to safely tow 6000 + pounds, 1500 + miles, with a vehicle that only has a 5500 pound tow rating in Hi. And I don't think he wants to drive 1500 miles at 20 mph in 4Low. LOL!
__________________
"In certain places, at certain hours, gazing at the sea is dangerous. It is what looking at a woman sometimes is." - Victor Hugo |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
1991 RRC 189060 miles and going
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 124
Gallery:
0
|
When I visit my LR mechanic he prefers to tow the DI & DII with Classic Rovers From his parking area into the lifts in his garage. He says he does not trust the Disco's as much with towing he is afraid something might go in the discos.
__________________
The City is a Jungle. ![]() 1991 RRC 1988 RRC (sold) |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Famous Owners of Land Rover vehicles | Bleed Green RRC | The Lounge | 37 | 08-28-2006 12:40 PM |
| Land Rover Frequently Asked Dumb Questions (very long...but funny) | JungleRR | General Land Rover Discussion | 0 | 05-26-2006 09:37 AM |
| Land Rover: Truly 'Extraordinary' | Serg | General Land Rover Discussion | 0 | 01-30-2006 11:37 PM |
| 1999 4.6 needs some work; fix or sell? | Spring | Range Rover P38, Mk III and Range Rover Sport | 17 | 01-29-2006 01:18 PM |
| Range Rover Sport Seems to have it all | Serg | General Land Rover Discussion | 1 | 12-05-2005 12:54 AM |