Land Rover Forum / Range Rover Forum Land Rover Forum Header Right
Go Back   Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rovers Only General Forums > Accessories
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

   
LandRoversOnly.com is the premier Land Rover Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2007, 06:30 PM   #16 (permalink)
Rebuilding Rover
 
ArmyRover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 2,383
Gallery: 0
Default

Sweet I know mine sure as hell couldn't do that nice work brother... by the way love the tires
__________________
"Only two defining forces ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G.I. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom."

http://www.wheelinrovers.com/



91 Range Rover Classic
90 RRC Parts truck
94 Saab gas mileage beater
ArmyRover is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-21-2007, 06:35 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 426
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmyRover
Sweet I know mine sure as hell couldn't do that nice work brother... by the way love the tires
cheers
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 06:51 PM   #18 (permalink)
Ian Matthews
 
p76rangie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 2,157
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivespddisco
I as i said it was around 4 foot with people there to help
You said 4 feet, I said around the height of a tyre. From you new set of photos, it would appear that I was closer.

This discussion has always been about the springs and the lack of movement in them. I am not sure why you keep on posting photos that shows the rear dislocating when the front is only 1 foot of the ground and front barely moving at all.

You call this flex?

You would be better off getting rid of the springs and replacing then with lumps of steel
p76rangie is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 07:05 PM   #19 (permalink)
Rocky Mountain High
 
Funrover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 10,050
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p76rangie

You call this flex?

You would be better off getting rid of the springs and replacing then with lumps of steel
Let me see.... Suspension moved..... it would articulate over rocks, roots etc.... Steel lumps wouldn't do this!!

And even if the front doesn't move much there are reasons!!!! Many have been gone over it in exhausted details...YOU REFUSE TO LISTEN!!! Everyone you argue with has proof or an ability to back up what they say..... I don't recall you EVER having this ability! You talk and then show a car totally unrealted!!!

Yeah the samuri's were nice, the LEAF PACK flexed nicely...... BUT WE ARE ARGUING COILS AND EQUIPMENT!!! I don't care if you think I am a punk or what not...... I disagree with about 95% of what you say the other 5% i have read from an owners manuel...

Agree to disagree and move on already!!!!!
__________________
Don't Take Life to Serious, You'll Never Get Out Alive

"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from"


Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Colorado's own 'jacked up little kid' is Funrover. And he's usualy in the springs.
Funrover is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 07:14 PM   #20 (permalink)
Ian Matthews
 
p76rangie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 2,157
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funrover
Let me see.... Suspension moved..... it would articulate over rocks, roots etc.... Steel lumps wouldn't do this!!
Steel would only have slightly less movement.

The front has moved by only 1 foot. The back has dislocated. This means that the rear springs discolate with less than 1 foot of movement. At this point, as the springs are disloacted, the only weight on that tyre for traction is the weight of the wheel. A stock standard spring system would still have well over 1,000lb downward pressure on that wheel for traction.

So can you please explain to a fool like myself as to how this is an improvement to the vehicle??

I am sorry, but I have not come across too many forklifts out on the trail.

For the record, I am not the one that starts posts with my name in it. He just wants to argue, so lets argue.
p76rangie is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 07:45 PM   #21 (permalink)
The MoFab Man
 
-MOSES-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tejas
Posts: 439
Gallery: 0
Default

Oh, Here we are !

Amen FunRover !
__________________
*
*
http://www.MoFab.org
*
*
*
Are you gonna pass that ??
*
99' D1
55' S1 86" RHD SW
00' RR 4.6 HSE

My Favorites:
http://www.texasrovers.com/
http://pikespeakrovers.com/
http://oeminstock.com/
http://greatbasinrovers.com/
http://MyRover.net/

Yep, thats my truck in the avatar....
-MOSES- is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 07:47 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 426
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p76rangie
I am not sure why you keep on posting photos that shows the rear dislocating when the front is only 1 foot of the ground and front barely moving at all.

You call this flex?
well here it is at 1 foot
Attached Thumbnails
my-non-flexing-truck-1-foot-2.2.jpg  
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 07:58 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 426
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p76rangie
For the record, I am not the one that starts posts with my name in it. He just wants to argue, so lets argue.

ooh no my backwards friend you started it way back when with hate talk like this

Quote:
Originally Posted by p76rangie
Look at the front. No movement. Anyone can get the arse to fall out. This does nothing for it offroad.

You have proven time and time again that you are only interested in selling parts and the only off-road photos you seem to post is your disco parked on a wreck.

I would not go in your vehicle on anything past the carpark.

Why your continue to push your gear on this forum, I will continue to tell people how it serves no purpose, can make the vehicle worse off-road, and is basically a waste of money. But then there will be others that think that it looks great and they will buy it. But at least they were warned.

So please tell every one how my parts serve no purpose.
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 08:08 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Discoveryxd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 144
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p76rangie
So where is the 4 feet that you previously claimed. Also note that the front wheel does not change position from 1 foot to the max. That is, no movement in springs, only tilts car further. The high wheel has virtually not compressed at all, AGAIN this shows that the springs are tooooo stiff.

Why do you keep on posting photos that prove my point
why the hell do you think SafariGard sold the 3 link for the front? Cause these trucks have no flex in the front suspension! look at the front radius arms and how they mount to the axle, then look at the rear trailing arms.

The springs aren't the reason his front end doesn't flex as well as the rear you retard...
Discoveryxd is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 08:09 PM   #25 (permalink)
Rocky Mountain High
 
Funrover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 10,050
Gallery: 0
Default

I would be willing to sacrafice my truck for testing purposes...LOL...... some R&D!!!! LOL

Can I send a list of useless parts I would really like to test? LOL
__________________
Don't Take Life to Serious, You'll Never Get Out Alive

"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from"


Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Colorado's own 'jacked up little kid' is Funrover. And he's usualy in the springs.
Funrover is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 08:21 PM   #26 (permalink)
Ian Matthews
 
p76rangie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 2,157
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivespddisco
ooh no my backwards friend you started it way back when with hate talk like this

So please tell every one how my parts serve no purpose.
You posted photos of your truck with my name in the thread heading. So I assume that the purpose of your post was to have me comment on your truck. This I have done. You can comment on my truck when I post photos of it claiming that it has great flex. As this point I have not done so. But for some reason you want to keep on trying to move the discussion from yours to mine.
p76rangie is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 08:25 PM   #27 (permalink)
Ian Matthews
 
p76rangie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 2,157
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Discoveryxd
The springs aren't the reason his front end doesn't flex as well as the rear you retard...
Can you then please explain why the D2 I posted photos of has a lot more flex in the front end that 5Speeds.

The limiting factors of the front end were discussed in the last thread started by 5Speed. There is no debate about this. However, the limited flex in 5Speed's front end is not caused by these factors as other vehicles with the same factors flex more. A stock standard Rover flexes more in the front.
p76rangie is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 08:37 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 426
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funrover
I would be willing to sacrafice my truck for testing purposes...LOL...... some R&D!!!! LOL

Can I send a list of useless parts I would really like to test? LOL

LOL
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 08:43 PM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 426
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p76rangie
You posted photos of your truck with my name in the thread heading. So I assume that the purpose of your post was to have me comment on your truck. This I have done. You can comment on my truck when I post photos of it claiming that it has great flex. As this point I have not done so. But for some reason you want to keep on trying to move the discussion from yours to mine.

You only bash me and my suspension that is why i called you out on this.
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 08:46 PM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 426
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p76rangie
. A stock standard Rover flexes more in the front.
I have many parts trucks would you like me to lift them to 3.5 ft? do you think it will flex more?
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

  Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rovers Only General Forums > Accessories



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
All content is copyright © 2004-2008 www.landroversonly.com and its original authors. Land Rovers Only is in no way affiliated with Land Rover