Land Rover Forum / Range Rover Forum Land Rover Forum Header Right
Go Back   Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rovers Only General Forums > Accessories
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

   
LandRoversOnly.com is the premier Land Rover Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2007, 01:32 AM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Alberta,Canada.
Posts: 407
Gallery: 0
Default

I don't want to nit pick but I just noticed that the stocker also still has its anti-sway bars! But I suppose that is part of what makes it 'stock'. Never mind, brain fart.
Nice pic's.
__________________
"Your only supposed to blow the BLOODY DOORS OFF" The Italian job 1969.
roverandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-28-2007, 07:37 AM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Roverhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harrisonburg, Virginia
Posts: 787
Gallery: 0
Default

Roll it Justin! I wanna see that stock truck on it's side!
__________________
It just doesn't matter.
Roverhound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 03:26 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 427
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p76rangie
How much has been stripped out of the stock Disco?
It does not look like it has the motor in it and a lot of other stuff appears to have been taken out.

TROLL go away.

yes the motor is in it and all the big bits. missing some seats and a fender.
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 03:29 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 427
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apbtpetey
Great pics, I will say though that looking at just the front there doesn't seem to much difference in travel (again just looking at the front) The big difference is in the flex in the rear.

Is there a way to measure how much the front axle moves with your setup compared to the stock setup?

Hands down I would take your setup compared to the stock setup, but the front does seem to be way more limited in travel compared to the rear.

I guess what I am asking is if the stock setup was to have the rear changed to your same rear setup and the front left stock what would the difference in flexing be????

You are still going to get big flex from the rear. the front will not drop down as far as mine in a cross axle situation. the stock shocks are to short. Dose this answer your question?
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 03:38 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 427
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roverandom
X2 on that, also the 'big' Rover is running much larger tires than the other 'stock' Rover. This would also make a difference in axle articulation as far as how high off the ground the axle is? I wonder how much difference between the two set-ups there would be if both trucks ran the same size tire?

I dont think there will be as much difference as you would think. A stock tire is around 28 in. mine are 37 in. 9 in difference. So the front tire will stay 4.5 inches closer to the ground and the rear will come off the ground 4.5 inches sooner. The big discos rear starts to lift at 36 inches I would ASSUME at 31 inches the same truck with 28s for tires would start to lift.
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 03:39 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 427
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roverandom
I don't want to nit pick but I just noticed that the stocker also still has its anti-sway bars! But I suppose that is part of what makes it 'stock'. Never mind, brain fart.
Nice pic's.
We did this more as a goof not to make real science
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 03:40 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 427
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roverhound
Roll it Justin! I wanna see that stock truck on it's side!

I was going to but there is 2 nice doors on that side. It would be a wast. for this FL truck to get smashed for a joke.
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 04:17 PM   #23 (permalink)
Support Our Troops
 
apbtpetey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 3,442
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivespddisco
You are still going to get big flex from the rear. the front will not drop down as far as mine in a cross axle situation. the stock shocks are to short. Dose this answer your question?
Yeah it does, I was just trying to make sense out of what was saying in the past. I was mainly looking for a comparison between the amount of flex in a stock front compared to flex from a set up like yours in the front.

What is the difference in travel between your front shocks and stock shocks?
__________________
John Conklin
LRO Moderator
apbtpetey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 04:17 PM   #24 (permalink)
Ian Matthews
 
p76rangie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 2,165
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivespddisco
I dont think there will be as much difference as you would think. A stock tire is around 28 in. mine are 37 in. 9 in difference. So the front tire will stay 4.5 inches closer to the ground and the rear will come off the ground 4.5 inches sooner. The big discos rear starts to lift at 36 inches I would ASSUME at 31 inches the same truck with 28s for tires would start to lift.
This was not really a serious answer, was it?
p76rangie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 04:20 PM   #25 (permalink)
Ian Matthews
 
p76rangie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 2,165
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivespddisco
We did this more as a goof not to make real science
So you weren't out to prove anything. So you suceeded.

You actually proved that your springs do move less than a stocker
p76rangie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 05:43 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 427
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apbtpetey
Yeah it does, I was just trying to make sense out of what was saying in the past. I was mainly looking for a comparison between the amount of flex in a stock front compared to flex from a set up like yours in the front.

What is the difference in travel between your front shocks and stock shocks?
I think stock is like 5 in mine are 12.

So if you took off my shocks and put stock ones on it would not flex more then stock. the shock will limit the travel A good suspension is a mix off all the parts.

I always try to get people to tell me what size tire they want to run. then build it from there.


you want a 33 ok then you need a 3in with all these parts lift and to do some trimming. you want 35s of 4 in lift with these parts and a lot of trimming

so on and so on.
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 05:29 PM   #27 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Buddy Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 361
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivespddisco
I dont think there will be as much difference as you would think. A stock tire is around 28 in. mine are 37 in. 9 in difference. So the front tire will stay 4.5 inches closer to the ground and the rear will come off the ground 4.5 inches sooner. The big discos rear starts to lift at 36 inches I would ASSUME at 31 inches the same truck with 28s for tires would start to lift.
I think tire size makes even less of a difference then that. Because what you are measuring is how far the bottom of the front tire is off the ground relative to the bottom of the rear tire. The only thing that the larger tires do is raise the vehicle they don't actually effect the aspect of the front and rear axle in relationship to each other. So 37" or 29" really is irrelevant or at least a very minor consideration in testing articulation. Although given the same suspension on both vehicles with those two tire sets I would wager that the truck with the bigger tires would tip over first because of the higher center of gravity.
__________________
'97 Disco

Buddy Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 07:35 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fivespddisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Equipe,Qt,ARB,Ashcroft dealer
Posts: 427
Gallery: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buddy Lee
I would wager that the truck with the bigger tires would tip over first because of the higher center of gravity.
Dont forget the big disco has a WIDER stance. the stock wanted to tip at 3.5 foot i had to hold the ass end down. we could not get the 3.5 pic.
__________________
Check out WWW.Lucky8LLc.com 716-898-8153 Justin
fivespddisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 12:39 AM   #29 (permalink)
Ian Matthews
 
p76rangie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 2,165
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivespddisco
I think stock is like 5 in mine are 12.
Just a little out as usual. Stock is 8.6 inches of travel.
I will not ask what you have on yours as you have not been able to supply any specs on suspension. But, for example, even Procomp Plus 5 shocks only have an extra 1.8 inches of travel over standard.
p76rangie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 12:40 AM   #30 (permalink)
Ian Matthews
 
p76rangie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 2,165
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivespddisco
the stock wanted to tip at 3.5 foot i had to hold the ass end down.
Do you think that the flat tyres may have contributed to the instability?
p76rangie is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rovers Only General Forums > Accessories



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
All content is copyright © 2004-2008 www.landroversonly.com and its original authors. Land Rovers Only is in no way affiliated with Land Rover