Land Rover Forum / Range Rover Forum Land Rover Forum Header Right
Go Back   Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rover Model Forums > Discovery Series II
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

   
LandRoversOnly.com is the premier Land Rover Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-30-2007, 07:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
jbf
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Gallery: 0
Default Discovery II Diagnosis - OBD Codes

My 2000 Discovery II is reading:

P0150 - O2 Sensor Circuit - Bank 2, Sensor 1
P0174 - System too Lean - Bank 2
P1174* Pending - Something to do with Lamda control - Bank 2

I cleaned my MAF with the CRC cleaner because it was cheap and easy, but the codes are coming back. If it were the MAF sensor, wouldn't both sides read as bad? More info:

Long Term Fuel Trim
Bank 1 - 1.6%
Bank 2 - 25.0%

Short Term Fuel Trim
Bank 1 - 0% +/-
Bank 2 - 25% and does not move

I am considering changing the Bank 2 #1 O2 sensor per the P0150 code. Any other recommendations out there?
jbf is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-30-2007, 07:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Disco Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 5,771
Gallery: 0
Default

How many miles on the truck?
After you're cleaning of the MAF, you may need to replace it also, Bosch MAF's don't take to being cleaned.
Mike
Disco Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2007, 07:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
jbf
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Gallery: 0
Default 113K miles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disco Mike
How many miles on the truck?
After you're cleaning of the MAF, you may need to replace it also, Bosch MAF's don't take to being cleaned.
Mike
113K miles on the truck. We have owned it since new and I believe the MAF is original. My local independent parts store (not a Land Rover specialist) thinks I should run some Techron to clean the injectors first. He says O2 sensor faults are usually indicative of something else. Your thoughts?
jbf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2007, 08:36 PM   #4 (permalink)
'00 DII Member
 
auwesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 223
Gallery: 0
Default

It's probably time to change the MAF, but generally you get an incorrect gear ratio code as well with bank 1 and 2 lean codes.

I know I cleaned my MAF a few times, and it would only go a few thousand miles before it threw the codes again, so cleaning it isn't the answer as Mike said.

I'm not so sure about the techron. Do you use 91+ octane normaly?
__________________
'00 DII
'07 Toyota Taco
War Eagle!
auwesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 06:04 AM   #5 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Disco Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 5,771
Gallery: 0
Default

Normally 02 sensors are pretty much in need of replacement once they clear 100,000 miles, so even though you may only have one fault code, I wouls replace the four of them.
Techtron is pretty good especially when used while at highway speeds, if you can find some B&G 44K additive, send the extra money and use it.
Mike
Disco Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 02:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
jbf
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Gallery: 0
Default So what order would you proceed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disco Mike
Normally 02 sensors are pretty much in need of replacement once they clear 100,000 miles, so even though you may only have one fault code, I wouls replace the four of them.
Techtron is pretty good especially when used while at highway speeds, if you can find some B&G 44K additive, send the extra money and use it.
Mike
The DII appears to be running fine and my primary goal now is to clear the service light for sale of the truck. If I want to be cheap, what order would you proceed on the options mentioned below?

- B&G 44K (or Techron)
- new MAF
- new O2 sensor for bank 2, sensor 1 (is this the front sensor?)
- new O2 sensors all around

Thanks, your advise is appreciated.
jbf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 02:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Disco Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 5,771
Gallery: 0
Default

There is no such thing as going cheap on your Disco.
Mike
Disco Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 03:11 PM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 55
Gallery: 0
Default

1. Techron / BG44 ~$10
2. Oxygen Sensor ~$60 (atlanticbritish.com)
3. 4x Oxygen Sensor ~$240
4. MAF Sensor ~$250

I'd hold off on the MAF - it malfunctioning should lead to both banks running lean or rich. And both banks would be either rich or lean.
ealex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 04:51 PM   #9 (permalink)
'00 DII Member
 
auwesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 223
Gallery: 0
Default

What year is your truck? I didn't see it on this thread but I may have missed it.
If it's a '99 - '02 MAF is only $145. But I'm also not totally convinced it's the MAF (even though you may as well probably change it out of preventive maintainance).
__________________
'00 DII
'07 Toyota Taco
War Eagle!
auwesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 04:57 PM   #10 (permalink)
jbf
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by auwesman
What year is your truck? I didn't see it on this thread but I may have missed it.
If it's a '99 - '02 MAF is only $145. But I'm also not totally convinced it's the MAF (even though you may as well probably change it out of preventive maintainance).
It is a 2000 Disco II with 113K miles. Since the codes all read the problem is confined to bank 2, I was drawing the same conclusion.
jbf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2007, 07:30 PM   #11 (permalink)
Former NAS LR TECH, Current AUS LR TECH
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DOWN UNDER
Posts: 1,884
Gallery: 0
Default

start with the first oxygen sensor.

its readings could be off enough confusing the pcm.

if you still have a lean code then check for the air leaks on that side.

if no hoses are broken then its possible you have a bad intake gasket, that kinda diag is a bit more difficult to do but various means can be done including using a can of propane, basically if a leak occurs the propane will be sucked in and the vehicle will run a bit diferent.
__________________
I work on Rovers. Got a question just ask.
Rovin4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 09:40 AM   #12 (permalink)
jbf
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Gallery: 0
Default Sensor 1, Bank 2 = right side, pre-cat ??

Thanks for all the advise. Can someone confirm for me:

Sensor 1 = pre-cat
Bank 2 = right (passenger) side

AND finally, among all the brands available, are Walker sensors any good?
jbf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 10:49 AM   #13 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Disco Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 5,771
Gallery: 0
Default

You are correct, but with your mileage, you should replace all 4. I believe Atlantic British still has them on sale for $59.
Mike
Disco Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 01:52 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK,west Country
Posts: 146
Gallery: 0
Default

Rather than waste money on oxygen sensors,why dont you just swop front sensors from side to side and see if the codes and trims move too ?
If the engine has had decent fuel and servicing there is no reason why the sensors should be all dead.Its a waste of money and raw materials too.
Diagnose it properly and only replace what doesnt work.
buick215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 02:16 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Elemental's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,360
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buick215
Rather than waste money on oxygen sensors,why dont you just swop front sensors from side to side and see if the codes and trims move too ?
If the engine has had decent fuel and servicing there is no reason why the sensors should be all dead.Its a waste of money and raw materials too.
Diagnose it properly and only replace what doesnt work.



Spot on brother!~
__________________
When I was done with her, her bed needed Shamwow sheets!
Elemental is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rover Model Forums > Discovery Series II



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
All content is copyright © 2004-2008 www.landroversonly.com and its original authors. Land Rovers Only is in no way affiliated with Land Rover