![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Gallery:
0
|
My 2000 Discovery II is reading:
P0150 - O2 Sensor Circuit - Bank 2, Sensor 1 P0174 - System too Lean - Bank 2 P1174* Pending - Something to do with Lamda control - Bank 2 I cleaned my MAF with the CRC cleaner because it was cheap and easy, but the codes are coming back. If it were the MAF sensor, wouldn't both sides read as bad? More info: Long Term Fuel Trim Bank 1 - 1.6% Bank 2 - 25.0% Short Term Fuel Trim Bank 1 - 0% +/- Bank 2 - 25% and does not move I am considering changing the Bank 2 #1 O2 sensor per the P0150 code. Any other recommendations out there? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Gallery:
0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
'00 DII Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 223
Gallery:
0
|
It's probably time to change the MAF, but generally you get an incorrect gear ratio code as well with bank 1 and 2 lean codes.
I know I cleaned my MAF a few times, and it would only go a few thousand miles before it threw the codes again, so cleaning it isn't the answer as Mike said. I'm not so sure about the techron. Do you use 91+ octane normaly?
__________________
'00 DII '07 Toyota Taco War Eagle! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 5,771
Gallery:
0
|
Normally 02 sensors are pretty much in need of replacement once they clear 100,000 miles, so even though you may only have one fault code, I wouls replace the four of them.
Techtron is pretty good especially when used while at highway speeds, if you can find some B&G 44K additive, send the extra money and use it. Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Gallery:
0
|
Quote:
- B&G 44K (or Techron) - new MAF - new O2 sensor for bank 2, sensor 1 (is this the front sensor?) - new O2 sensors all around Thanks, your advise is appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 55
Gallery:
0
|
1. Techron / BG44 ~$10
2. Oxygen Sensor ~$60 (atlanticbritish.com) 3. 4x Oxygen Sensor ~$240 4. MAF Sensor ~$250 I'd hold off on the MAF - it malfunctioning should lead to both banks running lean or rich. And both banks would be either rich or lean. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
'00 DII Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 223
Gallery:
0
|
What year is your truck? I didn't see it on this thread but I may have missed it.
If it's a '99 - '02 MAF is only $145. But I'm also not totally convinced it's the MAF (even though you may as well probably change it out of preventive maintainance).
__________________
'00 DII '07 Toyota Taco War Eagle! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Gallery:
0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Former NAS LR TECH, Current AUS LR TECH
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DOWN UNDER
Posts: 1,884
Gallery:
0
|
start with the first oxygen sensor.
its readings could be off enough confusing the pcm. if you still have a lean code then check for the air leaks on that side. if no hoses are broken then its possible you have a bad intake gasket, that kinda diag is a bit more difficult to do but various means can be done including using a can of propane, basically if a leak occurs the propane will be sucked in and the vehicle will run a bit diferent.
__________________
I work on Rovers. Got a question just ask. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Gallery:
0
|
Thanks for all the advise. Can someone confirm for me:
Sensor 1 = pre-cat Bank 2 = right (passenger) side AND finally, among all the brands available, are Walker sensors any good? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK,west Country
Posts: 146
Gallery:
0
|
Rather than waste money on oxygen sensors,why dont you just swop front sensors from side to side and see if the codes and trims move too ?
If the engine has had decent fuel and servicing there is no reason why the sensors should be all dead.Its a waste of money and raw materials too. Diagnose it properly and only replace what doesnt work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,360
Gallery:
0
|
Quote:
Spot on brother!~
__________________
When I was done with her, her bed needed Shamwow sheets! |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|