Land Rover Forum / Range Rover Forum Land Rover Forum Header Right
Go Back   Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rover Model Forums > Discovery Series II
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

   
LandRoversOnly.com is the premier Land Rover Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-08-2008, 09:49 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 72
Gallery: 0
Default Does anyone have a fuel consumption graph

Does anyone have a fuel consumption graph for a 99/2001 Disco II? I would like to know for example how much more gas mileage I get at 72MPH than at 75MPH. Mercedes used to publish this info in the owner's manual but I cannot find anything in the Land Rover manual.
tyl604 is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-08-2008, 10:13 AM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Disco Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 5,771
Gallery: 0
Default

There is no such item published by Rover.
There are way too many variables. What are you want to do or find out? I'll tell you, driving at those speeds won't help your mileage.
What have you tried to do to improve your mileage so far?
Mike
Disco Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 04:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 72
Gallery: 0
Default

I installed the tornado in all three Land Rovers about a year ago; cannot tell that it did any good. Getting about 11-12MPG in town and something like 17-18 hwy driving about 75-79 mph. All cars have new filters, plugs/wires OK or new. As gas prices escalate I am interested in better gas mileage. I can do a self test on the expressway at different speeds but hoped the figures might be published. I am aware of the typical reccs - no jackrabbit starts, proper tire inflation, etc. Wonder if the engine can be successfully detuned for better gas mileage.
tyl604 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 05:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Disco Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 5,771
Gallery: 0
Default

Your not going to get much better then your current highway mileage.
Mike
Disco Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 08:49 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
jmrivera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 332
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyl604 View Post
As gas prices escalate I am interested in better gas mileage.
A Discovery and better gas mileage don't really go hand in hand.... If your #1 worry is gas mileage, I suggest you sell the Disco. and get a hybrid... Just my opinion....

Jonathan
jmrivera is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 09:59 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
PeteRice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 75
Gallery: 0
Default

Its best just not to think about MPG. Just fill when the gauge says E. thats what I do
__________________
2000 Land Rover Disco II
My Disco's a bush truck. Wtf to I care about scratches?
PeteRice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 01:58 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5
Gallery: 0
Exclamation

I did did run across an article about this device a few months ago. I have no idea if it actually works or if there would be any detrimental side affects? Apperantly, it works by adding Hydrogen into the intake air/fuel mixture to suppliment your fuel usage. I cannot neccessarly condone such a device, but hey if you are desperate and drastically trying and get your MPG down then something like this may be the ticket. Try AT YOUR OWN RISK!! I have not actually seen any of these on any car yet.

http://www.hydro4000.com/default.htm

Also, after market performance exhaust or intake may help it breathe a bit easier too


Although, as previously mentioned, gas milage was not my biggest concern when I puchased my Diso. As long as it is generally with in factory spec, I am happy!
DINOKLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 05:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
'00 DII Member
 
auwesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 223
Gallery: 0
Default

That thing kind of looks like a "Mr. Fission"
__________________
'00 DII
'07 Toyota Taco
War Eagle!
auwesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 10:53 AM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Centerville, GA
Posts: 2
Gallery: 0
Default

just joined the forum and new to land rover. i have had a '00 disco II for a few months and love it. my question is the abilty to run regular gas instead of premium...that stuff is getting expensive. thanks for any help!!
__________________
GAROVER
garover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 11:54 AM   #10 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Disco Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 5,771
Gallery: 0
Default

NO WAY. Don't even thnk about it unless you want at least a 2 plus MPG loss and the additional expense of valve and head work from excessive carbon.
Mike
Disco Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 12:30 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Centerville, GA
Posts: 2
Gallery: 0
Default

is mid grade out of the question, thats what i've been runing for about a month?
__________________
GAROVER
garover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 04:30 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Steph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Outaouais,Quebec,Canada
Posts: 348
Gallery: 0
Default

at least 91 octane.
__________________
Knowledge is only really worth anything when its been experienced first hand. If you heard it from a guy who heard it from a guy.....nevermind and keep it to yourself.
Steph is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 04:39 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
jmrivera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 332
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disco Mike View Post
NO WAY. Don't even thnk about it unless you want at least a 2 plus MPG loss and the additional expense of valve and head work from excessive carbon.
Mike
I've always run at lest 91 octane (that's all that's available in my area), but I have read on several reputable websites that premium is not needed in today's modern cars...

How does the Discovery differ from these??? I am not arguing , like I stated, I use premium all the time, I just want to know what is different about my truck... My '06 BMW 330i also calls for premium, but the dealer told me they only run regular (87 octane here). Just curious...

Thanks,
Jonathan
jmrivera is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 04:43 PM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5
Gallery: 0
Default

To add, I know the book says no use of octane booster protducts, but I have to ask: what is the reasoning behind this? I regularly fill up with premium as advised, but I have a discount available with with the mid grade only. I was thinking of getting that, plus adding octane booster? So far I have avoided it.. any thoughts?

Thanks!
DINOKLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 04:55 PM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmrivera View Post
I've always run at lest 91 octane (that's all that's available in my area), but I have read on several reputable websites that premium is not needed in today's modern cars...

How does the Discovery differ from these??? I am not arguing , like I stated, I use premium all the time, I just want to know what is different about my truck... My '06 BMW 330i also calls for premium, but the dealer told me they only run regular (87 octane here). Just curious...

Thanks,
Jonathan
Higher Octane fuels are usually required with high compresion engines/high performance applications. On modern vehicles lower octane fuels than required can have a couple more notable affects.

1: If your vehicle has a knock sensor, the computer will retard the timing with the use of a lower grade fuel to avoid knocking/pinging/detonation of the fuel. What is most noticable for you in this situation is a SERIOUS loss of power!

2: If your vehicle is not equiped with a knock sensor, it will be very unhappy, knocking and pinging along(especially under load).. that diesely sound you hear when this occurs is the sound of the fuel exploding in the combustion chamber instead of being properly burned. This can lead to very detrimental effects to your engine internal$$$.

P.S. If your bimmer does not knock with low grade fuel, try a dyno test with both types.. you will never think of skimping with 87 again!

Cheers!
DINOKLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rover Model Forums > Discovery Series II



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Misfire HELP! mrach21061 Discovery Series II 28 12-13-2007 08:38 PM
Any body doing electric hybrid in a LandRover? Adam in NYC USA Hybrid 54 12-23-2006 11:39 PM
HELP!! Fuel Pump??? Truck still on trail. bluemax09 Discovery Series I 14 02-22-2006 04:40 PM
1999 4.6 needs some work; fix or sell? Spring Range Rover P38, Mk III and Range Rover Sport 17 01-29-2006 02:18 PM
Fuel consumption Aaron Discovery Series I 15 07-26-2005 01:47 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
All content is copyright © 2004-2008 www.landroversonly.com and its original authors. Land Rovers Only is in no way affiliated with Land Rover