![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 14
Gallery:
0
|
I am currently looking at two different disco II's, ones a 2000 SE w/ 110,000miles for $6000 and the other is a 2002 SE with 60,000miles for $8000. I have looked at both in person and cranked them both up but being new to the Land Rover line wondering what i should be looking for in general to see which one is a better buy. I know the 2000 has CDL while the 2002 does not which in the long run would be better since the disco would be a weekend toy and not a a daily driver i have a saturn for that. thanks
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Outaouais,Quebec,Canada
Posts: 351
Gallery:
0
|
Which one feels better and more solid to you ??? I would tend to go with the one with less mileage. Escpecially since there's quite a difference. You can always swap the t-case with one that accepts cdl if you want it.
Go with the one you like best. Dive under and check for leaks.
__________________
Knowledge is only really worth anything when its been experienced first hand. If you heard it from a guy who heard it from a guy.....nevermind and keep it to yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 463
Gallery:
0
|
I've got an 02 and love it. No CDL but... Wasn't the ABS modulator updated at some point??? I've heard of the problems with the modulator on the Early Disco's, Shuttle valve and what not. Was there any change? Not hijacking the tread but that would be useful information to know for your purchase.
__________________
Brian Morgan I bitch because I can, I can because I live in America. 2002 Discovery SE (Stock - No ACE, No SLS) 1995 Nissan Pathfinder SE (Sold) 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier (Red Bullet) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
'00 DII Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 223
Gallery:
0
|
I'm a little partial to the '00s myself...................but I do have to agree that 60k is less risky than 100k.
The question is, are you going to use it to off road any or is this going to be strictly a street car? If you don't plan on using it to off road much (or any) than the advantage of an '00 is pretty much out the window. I have an '00 with over 120k on the odo and have had no major issues, but have kept it maintained also. Does either one have service records included?
__________________
'00 DII '07 Toyota Taco War Eagle! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
2002 Discovery II SE
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 356
Gallery:
0
|
I'd go for the one with less milage myself. I was going to buy a 1999 SII with almost 300,000km on it. I spent $2,800 more and bought a 2002 with 126,000km on it. After Land Rover replaced every gasket in the engine free of charge, I got a smokin deal.
You can add a CDL for $500 or less if you look in the right places.
__________________
2002 Discovery Series II SE. 2" OME Heavy Duty. 265/65R18 BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A's. I told my wife if the Land Rover goes, so do I. That shut her up. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Idea for a poll | Crysyn | Board Announcements, Suggestions and Questions | 5 | 03-01-2008 07:22 PM |
| Need Opinion ASAP! | twofocused | Discovery Series I | 7 | 10-03-2007 06:35 PM |
| Poll: Differential Guards | bernardmann | Accessories | 12 | 10-24-2006 02:39 PM |
| Purchase opinion???? | 6cuda6 | Discovery Series I | 13 | 04-14-2006 03:44 PM |
| Thong Model Poll | SCSL | General Land Rover Discussion | 21 | 06-08-2005 01:53 PM |