Land Rover Forum / Range Rover Forum Land Rover Forum Header Right
Go Back   Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rovers Only General Forums > Wheels and Tires
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

   
LandRoversOnly.com is the premier Land Rover Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-16-2008, 09:23 AM   #1 (permalink)
got mud?
 
Jupiter Rover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 1,021
Gallery: 0
Default 235/85 or 285/75 for mud/trail? skinny 32" or wide 33"

I have to order new tires this week. So, after researching many different types of mud terrains, I have decided to go with Firestone's Destination M/Ts. The reviews say they wear great on road ( this is a must since my rover is a DD, however I do hit the trails nearly every weekend). Reviews and members of the forum also have stated that they perform better in mud then the BFG.

I currently run a 285/60/18 nitto grappler.. and I have wanted a pizza cutter for some time (ideally a 255/85. Firestone does not make this size)
Since the mud gets so deep here in south Florida I like the height of the 285/75.. I have 779/762 OME springs and have already searched, people said 285s fit. I do barely any flexing so rubbing isn't an issue. What I want to know is what would be better for mud and trail.

235/85: skinny, supposedly better in mud because of its narrow width, BUT 32"

285/75: tall, added clearance could help me get through more of Florida's swampy terrain.

Would the skinny but shorter tire be a good compromise for a much wider, One inch taller tire.

or would the added height of the 285 be more beneficial.



I read about Every thread that included "235/85", "285/75" and "255/85." Maybe I should flip a coin haha..

thanks in advance.

p.s. This is on dweb as well, I was not sure if all you guys here check dweb.



-----------------------
Here are some pictures of the 285/75, compliments of Expedition Roverland.
Support & Sponsors
Attached Images
 
__________________
DII
-- Pete

285/75 r16 Destination M/Ts
Jupiter Rover is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-16-2008, 01:14 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
brooksa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gainesville, Ga
Posts: 125
Gallery: 0
Default

Are you still running 18's?
__________________
2004 DII SE7
brooksa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 04:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
Solihull Society, CO and High Desert Rovers, NM Member
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,307
Gallery: 0
Default

I've never run the 255/85 BFG M/T but some friends have. The ones that did not like them thought they were tippy way off camber and they have gone to and love the 285/75. They are both Colorado guys. A guy in Chicago where they play in fields of mud prefers the 255/85 because of less resistance to forward progress in the width. Could he really tell 30mm less width?? He always replied yes when it's times 4 tires. Who knows.

Rumors and hearsay is all I can provide.

I used to be a narrow freak, but by the time I made the mental jump to run 35's, 12.5 was the only width 35" cam in a non specialty tire (i.e. Simex & Interco)
__________________
Todd

Carpe Rangius Roverum
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 04:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Disco Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 6,069
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jupiter Rover View Post
I have to order new tires this week. So, after researching many different types of mud terrains, I have decided to go with Firestone's Destination M/Ts. The reviews say they wear great on road ( this is a must since my rover is a DD, however I do hit the trails nearly every weekend). Reviews and members of the forum also have stated that they perform better in mud then the BFG.

I currently run a 285/60/18 nitto grappler.. and I have wanted a pizza cutter for some time (ideally a 255/85. Firestone does not make this size)
Since the mud gets so deep here in south Florida I like the height of the 285/75.. I have 779/762 OME springs and have already searched, people said 285s fit. I do barely any flexing so rubbing isn't an issue. What I want to know is what would be better for mud and trail.

235/85: skinny, supposedly better in mud because of its narrow width, BUT 32"

285/75: tall, added clearance could help me get through more of Florida's swampy terrain.

Would the skinny but shorter tire be a good compromise for a much wider, One inch taller tire.

or would the added height of the 285 be more beneficial.



I read about Every thread that included "235/85", "285/75" and "255/85." Maybe I should flip a coin haha..

thanks in advance.

p.s. This is on dweb as well, I was not sure if all you guys here check dweb.



-----------------------
Here are some pictures of the 285/75, compliments of Expedition Roverland.
Support & Sponsors
Your spider gears and most likely your rear axles won't take those 285's for long.
You might want to consider the weak points in your truck and what happens when they fail, you can't put lockers in to strengthen up the diffs.
Mike
Disco Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 05:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
got mud?
 
Jupiter Rover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 1,021
Gallery: 0
Default

I won't be doing lockers and HD axles, shafts, ect. for a while. I'm thinking of just doing the 235's.
__________________
DII
-- Pete

285/75 r16 Destination M/Ts
Jupiter Rover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 05:32 PM   #6 (permalink)
Solihull Society, CO and High Desert Rovers, NM Member
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,307
Gallery: 0
Default

good choice, my first set of GY MT/R was 235/85. About the same size as the Camel Trophy rigs.
__________________
Todd

Carpe Rangius Roverum
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 06:09 PM   #7 (permalink)
got mud?
 
Jupiter Rover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 1,021
Gallery: 0
Default

What are you running now thor?
__________________
DII
-- Pete

285/75 r16 Destination M/Ts
Jupiter Rover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 07:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
Rebuilding Rover
 
ArmyRover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 2,850
Gallery: 0
Default

If memory serves Thor is running 35's and has one bad ass RRC...

I would go with the 235/85 or split the difference and go for the 265/75 both 32ish tires and will be more than sufficent for your needs.
__________________
"If you can't stand behind our soliders, then by all means stand in front
of them." unknown quote.


"Only two defining forces ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G.I. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom."

(offending Austrailians since 2008)

http://www.wheelinrovers.com/



91 Range Rover Classic
90 RRC Parts truck
89 Jaguar XJ6
ArmyRover is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rovers Only General Forums > Wheels and Tires



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Skinny or Wide ? SCSL Wheels and Tires 39 12-07-2006 10:58 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
All content is copyright © 2004-2008 www.landroversonly.com and its original authors. Land Rovers Only is in no way affiliated with Land Rover