Land Rover Forum / Range Rover Forum Land Rover Forum Header Right
Go Back   Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rovers Only General Forums > Wheels and Tires
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

   
LandRoversOnly.com is the premier Land Rover Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!


View Poll Results: Skinny or Wide Tires ?
Wide - Fat Boys are large & in charge 7 22.58%
Skinny - Pizza Cutters get you there & back 20 64.52%
Doesn't make a difference 4 12.90%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2006, 07:27 PM   #31 (permalink)
94 Defender 90
 
cellulararrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chester, NH
Posts: 1,070
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomar
You mean "Look what Superwinch conquered".
Haha. They certainly did put those to good use I suppose.
__________________

S.N.H.L.R.
cellulararrest is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-04-2006, 07:31 PM   #32 (permalink)
Rocky Mountain High
 
Funrover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 10,050
Gallery: 0
Default

I love my thin tires!!!!!! They have never failed me!!!!!! Wide is great in mud....... my thin do great on rocks... More weight per area for traction!!!
__________________
Don't Take Life to Serious, You'll Never Get Out Alive

"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from"


Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Colorado's own 'jacked up little kid' is Funrover. And he's usualy in the springs.
Funrover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 07:35 PM   #33 (permalink)
Ian Matthews
 
p76rangie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 2,157
Gallery: 0
Default

Jon, not sure why you think that narrow tyres wear faster. They generate less heat. Wide tyres are more affected by wheel alignment, balancing, and air pressure. As most people tend not to address these on a regular basis, the tyres tend to wear out quicker.
p76rangie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 04:51 AM   #34 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Disco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,819
Gallery: 0
Default

It really comes down to individual preference. These debates are great, but it's a lot like politics, in the end, everyone goes away unconvinced by the others persons arguement.
__________________
No hand signals, driver playing with his transfer Knob.
Disco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 12:00 PM   #35 (permalink)
Get in, hold on!
 
toyota_jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 627
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p76rangie
Jon, not sure why you think that narrow tyres wear faster. They generate less heat. Wide tyres are more affected by wheel alignment, balancing, and air pressure. As most people tend not to address these on a regular basis, the tyres tend to wear out quicker.
by putting more weight per sq inch, you do wear skinner tires out quicker, this isn't just an opinion, i've seen funrovers tires practly melt down. he bought his tires almost a year ago, and he is looking at needing tires in the near future. now i know there is a huge weight difference but just for example, i bought my tires (12.50's as opposed to funrovers 10.50's) used in nov. last year with about 85% tread, since then i have driven down from AK to CO, wheeled with him and gang all summer and my tires are prolly 60-65% tread left. he has prolly 15% left on his tires. (btw they are the same tire BFG AT/ KO) also when you wheel skinner tires and you have more force psi and when you catch a lug on a rock you are more likly to rip lugs off. once again seen it happen. however this also might be a fact of where you wheel. around here granite and rough rocks are primairly what we wheel, i don't like mud neither do most of my wheeling buddies, and rocks are much harder on tires than mud. not saying you don't have rocks down there but i tend to see predominately mud wheeling.
__________________
Quote:
I love Hillary Clinton saying " We all need to work hard for common good " I think Stalin said the same .
-TsiArt
The Garage-
1989 Mercedes 190D
1985 Toyota 4Runner
1985 Subaru GL wagon
toyota_jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 02:40 PM   #36 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
smileyq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 653
Gallery: 0
Default

I run 265"s on my DII and love them. Before these I ran 255. I cannot image going any wider especially just for looks. Myself owning a 1984 CJ-7 with 33x12.50 on it got really sick of the tires sticking out look. My opinion is that most people that buy the huge wide tires (especially jeep people) are buying them because they think it makes them look more bad ass. Skinny tire people buy them because they know they work and aren't worried about how bad ass their truck looks. Just my 2 cents.
__________________
"Good saddles ain't cheap, and cheap saddles ain't good."
smileyq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 03:10 PM   #37 (permalink)
Solihull Society, CO and High Desert Rovers, NM Member
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,295
Gallery: 0
Default

The maximum I ever ran on my 1995 RRC was a 235/85 and I loved them.

The 1992 RR has 285/75 (on stock 3 spoke wheels) and they still tuck very far into the wheel well, and they do not stick out when the truck is sitting level. I love them off road so far.

285 is the new skinny!!!
__________________
Todd

Carpe Rangius Roverum
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 03:35 PM   #38 (permalink)
Large Land Mammal
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Around....
Posts: 149
Gallery: 0
Default

the PO put truxus 265-75's on the RRC.....they look agressive, tuck under well and give a little extra height. I will say that having things all tucked under, and able to tuck in when needed makes things easy on the tight trails.

In my previous life, I lowered, bagged and rolled all tucked.......old habits die hard...
__________________
" We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence upon those who would do us harm." G.Orwell.
astateofmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 09:50 AM   #39 (permalink)
Skiving
 
Jarrodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 39
Gallery: 0
Default

I too think it depends on the terrain your in. I live in an area that is very mixed. In northern California you have muddy costal and foot hill conditions. My 235s have always performed very good in these conditions. However, If you climb into the sierra Nevadas, the 235s just do not cut it. they leave the rim extremely exposed and they are bit narrow to allow the side wall to get a good bit on the granite. I opted to move to 285s. This tire, as some have pointed out, is still "skinny" for the area, but they work better in the rocks. I think a 255 would be okay, but I would want a 6.5" rim. When it comes down to it, you will learn to drive the tires you have and pick lines accordingly.

-Jarrod
Jarrodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 10:58 AM   #40 (permalink)
Solihull Society, CO and High Desert Rovers, NM Member
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,295
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarrodw
..... I opted to move to 285s. This tire, as some have pointed out, is still "skinny" for the area, but they work better in the rocks.........-Jarrod
See 285 is the new skinny!
__________________
Todd

Carpe Rangius Roverum
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rovers Only General Forums > Wheels and Tires



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
All content is copyright © 2004-2008 www.landroversonly.com and its original authors. Land Rovers Only is in no way affiliated with Land Rover