Land Rover Forum / Range Rover Forum Land Rover Forum Header Right
Go Back   Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rover Model Forums > Range Rover Classic
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

   
LandRoversOnly.com is the premier Land Rover Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-24-2005, 08:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 55
Gallery: 0
Default 3.5 - 4.0

I have a rover with a 4.0 in it but am trying to drop in a 3.5, it is obdii which means no distributor. what would i need to do to put this in? I have heard they are both the same engines just with different displacement. thanks.
MrSpool is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-24-2005, 10:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Disco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,819
Gallery: 0
Default

It's not often that one wants to transplant a smaller capacity motor into the engine bay. What is wrong with your 4.0 litre motor?
__________________
No hand signals, driver playing with his transfer Knob.
Disco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 04:13 AM   #3 (permalink)
Moderator
 
TerryS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bloomfield, CT If I died today, I lived there all my life.
Posts: 2,151
Gallery: 0
Default

I got the history on why you want to do this, from the previous thread, but, as Disco says, what would posses you to put a 3.5 in to replace the bad 4.0?
A 3.9 would make more sense, as you wouldn't notice a power difference. but the 3.5 is going to feel like your 4.0 on 6 cylinders.

The bottome line is, if you were willing to go to the bother ( alot of labor is going to be invested here, not to mention the cost of parts to convert the 3.5 to a GEMS block) is that you would need to strip the front cover (oil pump and distributor) off, and replace it with the front cover and oil pump from the 4.0. Also the intake manifold from the 4.0 must be put onto the 3.5 as the fuel rail and throttle body( including the 4.0 MAF) must be retained to satisfy the GEMS ECU.

Thinking about it, I suppose you could leave the 3.5 front cover, including the distributor, in place, just changed over the top end. Man would that blow some mechanics mind when he opened the hood and saw no wires coming off the distributor to the plugs.

Personally, if it were me,and knowing what a pain in the ass it is to pull these hunks of aluminum out, I would only go through it once. If the money was an issue, I'd go find my own 'Desperate Housewife' and be her bitch.
TerryS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 07:51 AM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 55
Gallery: 0
Default

That makes alot of sence. The reason I was going to try to put in a 3.5 was that there is one that is relitively inexpensive, The guy is not sure if it is a 3.5 or a 3.9. I figured that pulling and replacing an engine would not take more than a day or so, (Maybe I am wrong on this) but it looks pretty easy. After I get the disco on the road I could then see if it is worth keeping. I have never driven it and I have no clue what the rest of the drive train is like.
MrSpool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 09:37 AM   #5 (permalink)
I'd love to be in the Rat Patrol
 
OkieRover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Norman, Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 2,922
Gallery: 2
Default

A day or so?
To pull it maybe. To do anything to it and put it back...it took us several days.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by msggunny View Post
I punch my clown daily.
Where are you? Get on the map.
2003 Discovery II SE, 1993 Range Rover LWB
OkieRover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 10:40 AM   #6 (permalink)
Moderator
 
TerryS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bloomfield, CT If I died today, I lived there all my life.
Posts: 2,151
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSpool
That makes alot of sence. The reason I was going to try to put in a 3.5 was that there is one that is relitively inexpensive, .
Ever hear the expression "Penny Wise, Pound Foolish"?

I have to say, even if it was free, I would not put a 3.5 in anything. You're going to do alot of work, and in the end, be completely dissatisfied with the resulting performance, be very lucky to sell the truck, not to mention probably taking a loss on it.

As Okie says, and I can attest to, having done many, it's more than a days work.

a 3.9 will say just that, on the top front of the plenum, cast right in, in big numerals "3.9" , whereas, as 3.5 won't have anything on the plenum
TerryS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 10:57 AM   #7 (permalink)
4x4 Adventure Gear
 
John C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tappan, NY
Posts: 1,175
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TerryS
Ever hear the expression "Penny Wise, Pound Foolish"?

I have to say, even if it was free, I would not put a 3.5 in anything. You're going to do alot of work, and in the end, be completely dissatisfied with the resulting performance, be very lucky to sell the truck, not to mention probably taking a loss on it.

As Okie says, and I can attest to, having done many, it's more than a days work.

a 3.9 will say just that, on the top front of the plenum, cast right in, in big numerals "3.9" , whereas, as 3.5 won't have anything on the plenum
How about a 3.5 in a Series truck? That would be pretty cool!!!
__________________
John C

1996 DI - 3" AG lift
1995 DI - Scorpion Racing Extreme Kit
1991 RR - parting out (few parts left)
1990 Kawasaki KL650B Tengai
1989 Kawasaki KLR650
John C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 12:09 PM   #8 (permalink)
Moderator
 
TerryS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bloomfield, CT If I died today, I lived there all my life.
Posts: 2,151
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John C
How about a 3.5 in a Series truck? That would be pretty cool!!!
Yeah? That's called a Stage One, and they are rare for a reason, they were awfull even when new.
TerryS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 01:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 55
Gallery: 0
Default

That settles it then, I will put a 4.0 in it or a 4.6. now about the install. Do I pull the trany with the engine or just pull the engine and leave the tranny? Most rear wheel drives I have done I pulled both, but this is awd so I am not sure. Thanks.
MrSpool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 01:41 PM   #10 (permalink)
Series Moderator
 
onslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Lake district,UK
Posts: 532
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OkieRover
A day or so?
To pull it maybe. To do anything to it and put it back...it took us several days.
Sorry chaps but I totally disagree (as usual)

It should take no more than a day to remove and a day to replace ive done it numerous times,and i can see quite a few good reasons for putting a 3.5 in place of the 4.0,firstly they are like dog shit (everywhere) and are extremely cheap,secondly power can be increased easily beyond the levels of a bog 4.0 easily and cheaply retaining drivability (cam,ported heads,4 barrel weber,tubular manifolds),thirdly they dont crack liners and are good for 200k miles plus ,and to finish parts are abundant and cheap and if you run them on a big carb they dont have the crappy efi to go wrong.
On the whole a good choice of engine swap.
As an example the 3.5 in my series 1 (1958) runs twin SU carbs,k&n filters and a piper 276 cam in a rover p5b high comp lump quite happiliy creates 185bhp without really trying.

when swapping just pull the engine and its not a job to worry about doing its as straight forward as engine swaps get.
onslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 02:31 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 55
Gallery: 0
Default

Thats a reliefe, I have been stairing at the engine bay trying to contemplate the complexity of the swap and it seems quite easy, there is more room than needed in there, along with minimal wires to remove and engine mounts are quite easy to get at as well. as for putting the 3.5 I wanted to do it while I looked for a 4.6, but those seem to be quite rare to find. Are there any good right up with pics on any of these boards of an engine install. I am kind of suprised how little info there is about this. Thanks.
MrSpool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 02:40 PM   #12 (permalink)
Moderator
 
TerryS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bloomfield, CT If I died today, I lived there all my life.
Posts: 2,151
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by onslow
Sorry chaps but I totally disagree (as usual)

.
Sorry, Ons, but in this case I have to disagree with you. The reason Spool indicated choosing a used 3.5 was cost savings. That being said, how much is any cheap engine after you tear it down to change the cam, cam bearings replace the lifters (You wouldn't put an ancient set of lifters atop a new cam would you?)
He would then have to either polish the ports himself, or send the heads out to have them done, polished and port matched. I don't know what your shop charges, but most automotive machine shops around here don't come cheap.(yeah, I know, you do it yourself right, so do I but Spool hasn't indicated he would) So, basically, he is completely rebuilding a 3.5, and it would have been more prudent to have taken all those steps, but on his original 4.0 (and not have wasted the $$$ on the 3.5 to begin with)
After all thats done, he still can't put the 4 barrel on(4barrel and manifold, another $800), as most states won't permit it, and it won't pass emmissions, and most states are now testing that too. He's working with a GEMS ecu system, and there will be problems in the ecu isn't seeing a running engine, and GEMS is also security critical, imobilizer and all Any 3.5 is going to 8 years old now, and probably a high miler. True that 3.5 engines never ( I never heard of one) had liner shifts, though they are know just as 3.9 and 4.2 for needing head gaskets as they age, steel head gaskets simply don't last forever.
So his "reasonable" 3.5 is now, conservatively, pushing $2500.

I just recently did a total on a 4.2 and with shop work and parts, was over $2k, and I don't put any price on my labor.
He hasn't indicated, but if it's a standard (R380) it isn't as critical, but if it's a ZF4, the gearbox govenor is likely to delay his shift. I agree, a removal can be done in a day, but he's not going to 'pop' the new one in the next day, as there are loads of bit and pieces to swap over, unless he's prebuilt the new 3.5, and gotten the flywheel with it (or torque converter plate)
I wouldn't disagree, a 3.5 with a Holley is basically what every healey owner wanted 25 years ago (There were lots of these around from Buicks) an I have one sitting out on the shop floor right now with a top mounted turbo and side draft carburator, and it will probably still sitting there when I'm dead and gone.
A 3.5 in your S1 must make it go like snot, but the S3 Stage one was a piece of Heath Robinson if I ever saw one, whoever designed that trans should have been shot.
I stick by my original statement; puting a 3.5 in his Disco would be a mistake.
(Besides, he seems to have gottewn religeon, and says he will seek out a 4.6, Now that's going in the RIGHT direction.
TerryS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 02:45 PM   #13 (permalink)
Moderator
 
TerryS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bloomfield, CT If I died today, I lived there all my life.
Posts: 2,151
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSpool
That settles it then, I will put a 4.0 in it or a 4.6. now about the install. Do I pull the trany with the engine or just pull the engine and leave the tranny? Most rear wheel drives I have done I pulled both, but this is awd so I am not sure. Thanks.
No, Trans & Transfer case stay' in the car.

Unbolt the torque converter from the engine while it is still in the car. Put the new engine in with torque converter attached to trans input shafts. DO NOT try to put it in with it bolted to the engine as you will very likely damage the gearbox pump. There is only one bearing there, in front of the pump, and jockying the engine around with the force on the input shaft is hazardous.
TerryS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2005, 02:59 PM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 55
Gallery: 0
Default

So leave The tranny in and just unbolt the engine from it. Sounds streight forward. I have never done a swap involving an automatic transmission, so the tourque converter kind of baffles me. I have heard that it should just be left on as is and slide the engine off of it. Is this true, and should I resurface the flywheel before the swap? Also which gaskets should I replace before installing the engine. Thanks.
MrSpool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2005, 04:22 AM   #15 (permalink)
Moderator
 
TerryS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bloomfield, CT If I died today, I lived there all my life.
Posts: 2,151
Gallery: 0
Default

There is no flywheel, per se, on an automatic. It's just a thin steel plate to which the ring gear, and torque converter are attached.

First thing you're going to do, is remove the small aluminum plate at the bottom of your bellhousing, front side. Then, rotating the engine with a socket on the front pulley/bolt, remove the bolts holding the torque converter to the adapter plate. If you remove the torque converter afterward, when you slide it back onto the trans input shaft be certain that the pump drive is engaged. There are two keys on the end of the TC spud, which engage into two slots on the pump drive. It is possible to not engage these, bolt up the engine and the first time you start it, the two keys promptly wipe out the pump drive.
TerryS is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rover Model Forums > Range Rover Classic



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
All content is copyright © 2004-2008 www.landroversonly.com and its original authors. Land Rovers Only is in no way affiliated with Land Rover