|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-16-2005, 11:10 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Gallery:
0
|
Should I buy a 97Disco or a Disco II?
Hi all, I'm going to see a 1997 Disco with 120k KM. I always like the Disco and interested in this one due to its price and relatively low mileage. However, I wonder if you guys would recommend the Disco II than the Disco of 1997?
I know that the Disco II has been improved a lot according to the magazine, but probably for the same reason, they're much more expensive in the used market. To me, the #1 priority is reliability and handling -- would the Disco I be good enough in these areas or you'd strongly recommend me to spend more for a newer Disco II? thanks in advance for any advice! |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
08-17-2005, 12:02 AM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,819
Gallery:
0
|
As I have only owned a D1 (two actually), I cannot speak about D2 reliability etc, besides, all vehicles have their own personalities. You might get a good one, a so-so one, or a lemon, but only time will tell you that. What I can tell you is, that I have had a dream run with both of mine. What you need to access however, is what you want the vehicle for. If you are looking to use it as your daily commuter with some off roading, then I believe the D1 is the better choice (better approach & departure angle), and it has less electronic "thingo's" that can go wrong. If off roading is not a consideration, the D2 might be the choice, especially if you like electronic "thingo's". I hope this helps.
__________________
No hand signals, driver playing with his transfer Knob. |
|
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 02:38 PM
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 203
Gallery:
0
|
I guess it depends on what you want to do with it...
If you want a capable and reliable vehicle, go with the D1... Some model years of the D2are close to the D1 in relaiabilty ('99 and '04, I think), but they'll cost you more money up front. The '03 I own has more modern bells and whistles than a D1 and most D2's, but that's about it... oh yeah, more horsepower and torgue, but that may not be important to you...
__________________
'03 Discovery HSE7 w/ACE and SLS... |
|
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 06:47 PM
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
RUGDRVR
|
I have the last of the D1's - a 1998 - and it is great. I like it better thanthe D2 for off road since the hill descent control is via the transmission and not via the brakes / ABS system. But the D2 does appear faster & peppier on the road.
It has proven to be very robust and met all the demands I have placed on it. One thought is that you should do ALL the 60K mileage maintenance items if you do decide to go with this one. R&R all fluids, filters (I like the K&N for air & K&N long oil) hoses, belts, plugs wires etc.... even if they look ok - don't toss 'em save 'em up as trail spares. I generally have a shop do the transmission since the cross bar is in the way & I hear its tough - but I should probably try it once for fun! Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 07:22 PM
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Rebuilding Rover
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 1,997
Gallery:
0
|
You two do realize of course this thread was posted........
3 years ago I don't think the OP is coming back for his answer
__________________
"Only two defining forces ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G.I. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom." http://snhlr.org/  91 Range Rover Classic 90 RRC Parts truck 94 Saab gas mileage beater 
|
|
|
|
|
07-14-2008, 08:17 PM
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 203
Gallery:
0
|
Quote:
__________________
'03 Discovery HSE7 w/ACE and SLS... |
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
