![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
the big yellow one is the sun!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 223
Gallery:
0
|
a friend and I got into a friendly discussion today about the capabilities or our rigs (both stock, he has a 97 Heep cherokee)
Many people say (everyone on this board) say Land Rovers are probably the most capable SUVs made, they were "designed for the trails"... even stock they can go amazing places other SUVs cannot. My question - why? What makes a Land Rover such a reliable off road vehicle? If they have a reputation for having alot wrong with them, why dont they just evaporate when taken offroad? PS - I love my Disco, and im not doubting its capabilities, I just need some data and facts and info to show people, lol. thanks!
__________________
97 D1 3" OME 32x11.50 BFG ATs GCR steels headers, exhaust, etc... |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Otherwise known as STEVE
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,968
Gallery:
0
|
They have very stout chassis and they carry the vast majority of their weight down low. They don't have tons of HP, but plenty of torque and far stronger transmissions and transfer cases than Heeps.
__________________
2002 Freelander 2000 DII w/CDL 1967 SIIA 109SW Former Rovers 2004 Modded "S" Disco, R.I.P. 2004 G4 Disco 2002 Modded Freelander 1995 Modded Disco 1994 D-90 #8 1993 NAS D110 1990 Range Rover County 1973 SIII 88 1972 Range Rover 2 door |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Rocky Mountain High
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 9,936
Gallery:
0
|
With the CDL or viscious coupling.....better traction...Coils provide better flex...lower weight dist.....stout.....etc etc.....I really like the fact I have better visability!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Majesticdisco1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Union City California
Posts: 1,197
Gallery:
0
|
Quote:
X2 on that Muddy Oval. They do have very stout chassis and construction systems within the body and safety cage. They also have very strong gearbox and transmissions. Plus they look better than most 4x4's. Thats why Jeeps say we don't understand which in fact we do that's why we drive rovers.
__________________
1996 D1 RTE 3" 33" BFG MUDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Roads?...Where we're going, we don't need roads...
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,365
Gallery:
0
|
hey, dont they also have a stock long arm suspension?? If not, those control arms are pretty long.
Keep in mind, as far as similar vehicles (weight, wheelbase, etc) it all comes down to the driver. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
|
Here come my .02
Down here, everyone is surprised to see me out on the trails but at the same time recognize that the Land Rover is the vehicle to have! Just today someone told me that I would be able to make it through where their H1 got stuck....I did! So down to the facts...Although some have criticised British Engineering with the D1, its construction is like none other. The drivetrain is made up of a combination of different great systems, for example, the Swivel Ball enclosed CV Joint. The Old Toyota BJs (also legendary) have this same system up front. Coil Sprung suspension. Transmissions and T-cases that are (seems like it to me) nearly indestructale. With sway bars removed, flex is optimal with the right sized tire (everyone has their own definition of this, but I find that 245/75/16 are PERFECT for a D1). With the bumper trimmed, frontal approach angle is GREAT and although the rear could be better, its a lot better than most SUVs. Another thing that makes the Disco such a great off roader (D1 atleast) is its ability to be serviced out on the field. Its a mix of modern computer controled engine management with classic drivetrain/suspension components. Another point to consider is that you can comfortably live out of a Disco with the right equipment and all of the survival essentials. But back to talk about stock rigs, its one of the few SUVs you can literally drive from the dealer to the trails. In the 90's this was so true, being that Land Rover chose Michelin XPCs as the standard tire...it just so happens that this tire is a great AT tire (my opinion). There are many more specific reasons whyt he Disco is a great off-roader, but I can't think of them right now, my nephew is screamin his lungs out because he doesnt want to go to sleep! Someone take over...
__________________
JC... 1996 Discovery SE - The Blue Marlin - gone =( 1965 Series IIa 109 RHD Dsl - Wilks www.TerraTrekker.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Former NAS LR TECH, Current AUS LR TECH
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DOWN UNDER
Posts: 1,659
Gallery:
0
|
What makes Land Rovers the best for offroading isnt the design.
Its the fact they are designed to go offroad, All Land Rovers. They are not adapted to go offroad. They new vehicles now like Audi and MB have offroad capability air ride vehicles that adapt to offroad conditions. But the question is is adapting a vehicle to somewhat offroad use better or is the designed for adventure better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 144
Gallery:
0
|
I own a 100% stock auto 98 disco and an 89 5 speed 4.2 wrangler. The wrangler has 5 inches of lift and 33/12.5/15 MT tires.
The Disco is WAY smoother on the trails. The Jeep has WAY better approach and departure angles. The Disco has WAY more articulation. The Jeep has a soft top. The Disco has AC, a lazy boy for a seat, and a radio with weather band (but also a front sunroof and rear windows not working). For deep mud, I'd prefer the Jeep (w/current set up). For a long steep hill climb, I'd prefer the Disco. For a boulder field, I'd prefer the Jeep (w/ current set up). For snow up to 14 inches, I'd prefer the Disco (jeep for more due to ground clearance). The Disco can cruise safely and comfortably at 80 mph. The jeep has a hard time getting to 60 mph. BOTH get horrible gas mileage (disco=14-16/ jeep=12 (due to the tires). The jeep has 250 k and has only needed a new ecu, u joints, carbarator, and wheel hubs (not a joke, that's it besides tires, brakes, cap, rotor, wires and plugs). The Disco (178 k) needs more things with greater frequency (mostly electronic, ha ha). If I could have only one, . . . I love them both so I'll keep each. I will say this, with a little lift, some bigger MT tires, a locking rear diff, sliders, winch and HD bumbers, the Disco would be the better rig by far. Let the debate continue! K |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
|
K12....good to see you again man!...been a while!
__________________
JC... 1996 Discovery SE - The Blue Marlin - gone =( 1965 Series IIa 109 RHD Dsl - Wilks www.TerraTrekker.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Crazy about Rovers and more...
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 2,887
Gallery:
0
|
Because it is a LR, LOL.
They were originally designed for off road use, multi-task vehicle (fire engine, tractor, welder, generator). I just didn't know what I was missing out on when it came to looking at the history of LR. The use of coils, and multilink suspension was the key to a good off road vehicle, at least IMO. I like the idea, with leafs, articulation and ride quality is all there.Plus the full time 4x4 system makes it superior to anything else, along with the off set pumpkins front and rear (diffs). Plus aren't these axles on RRCs, D1s and 2s, aren't they the equivalent to like a Dana 60 or something? ![]()
__________________
Pat Albaugh, Midwest Moderator "Diffage" -the point at which the truck's differential makes contact with the ground. http://www.cardomain.com/id/RageRover42Visit my RRC and others here!(updated as of September 15, 2006) 1995 RRC LWB -LT265/75R16 Pathfinder All Terrains -RTE 2" Lift Springs -Pro Comp ES9000 Shocks (from DAP Enterprises) -KMC Front Diff Guard -4 Desert Fox 55 watt Lighting -Radio Shack CB Radio (never know when signal fails on a cell phone) -2 Halogen Super Sport 100 watt forward lights -Brush Gaurd, meant for a Jeep Grand Cherokee, now fitted to the RRC -Lowe's Special "Homemade" Snorkel -T-Case out of an 92' RRC |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 808
Gallery:
0
|
Oooo eck talk about an open ended question, so many great statements already too! Lemme see what I can add...
First off from the day they were concieved way back when the earth was young they were being designed with a purpose in life, not as a fashion accessory. THey were designed to be all things for all men, to plough the fields, carry sheep, travel large distances, cross all terrains, be repairable by even the most inept mechanic in the middle of nowhere with nothing but bailer twine and grease, run on pretty much any combustable liquid, able to tow heavy loads anywhere (have heard stories of farmers happily towing 20+ tons off the back of a D90 200tdi!! )......The thing to try and do is not list what they can do but try and list what they can't!! The only thing I can think of is not do 35mpg, but then again thats not what they were designed for! Yes they have problems, yes they cost a bit to repair (esspecially the newer models), but after all is said and done there are still 75% of all Land Rovers ever built still working and driving around this planet and for me thats what makes the marque so good! Longevity and undeniable ability!
__________________
1992 K-reg 200TDI Defender 90 (Eva) MSN - Geobloke@hotmail.com There are a terrible lot of lies going around the world, and the worst of it is half of them are true.
Sir Winston Churchill |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 144
Gallery:
0
|
Quote:
Yeah Man. Been a little while since posting but always stop in for a visit. I have been working some serious hours at work and have been too busy to really post much. Summer is here and I am getting the Disco ready for a big road trip from PA out to Co and AZ. Def. doing some wheeling up in the San Juans around Ouray/Telluride, etc. May even blast over to Moab for a day. I have so many things to do to the disco to get ready: change fluids (all) front d-shaft u joints (already did rears) front hub bearings (already did rears) resolder window ecu and sunroof ecu weld on recovery points to front frame (got 11,000 lbs D rings from Tractor Supply for $5 each!!) t-stat, hoses, collant temp sensor tires (going with AT but would prefer MT) instal rear jump seat (lots of people in the disco)(already put one in) What's new down in FL? It must be hot already. Any good war stories of late? K12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Majesticdisco1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Union City California
Posts: 1,197
Gallery:
0
|
Not to mention girls dig Rovers all of my girlfriend friends always commment on how good I look in my lifted Disco. I better be careful don't want to be referee of a catfight.
![]()
__________________
1996 D1 RTE 3" 33" BFG MUDS |
|
|
|