Land Rover Forum / Range Rover Forum Land Rover Forum Header Right
Go Back   Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rover Model Forums > Discovery Series I
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-27-2006, 08:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
the big yellow one is the sun!
 
VArova87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 223
Gallery: 0
Default what makes a LR so good offroad?

a friend and I got into a friendly discussion today about the capabilities or our rigs (both stock, he has a 97 Heep cherokee)

Many people say (everyone on this board) say Land Rovers are probably the most capable SUVs made, they were "designed for the trails"... even stock they can go amazing places other SUVs cannot. My question - why? What makes a Land Rover such a reliable off road vehicle? If they have a reputation for having alot wrong with them, why dont they just evaporate when taken offroad?

PS - I love my Disco, and im not doubting its capabilities, I just need some data and facts and info to show people, lol. thanks!
__________________
97 D1
3" OME
32x11.50 BFG ATs
GCR steels
headers, exhaust, etc...
VArova87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-27-2006, 10:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Otherwise known as STEVE
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,968
Gallery: 0
Default

They have very stout chassis and they carry the vast majority of their weight down low. They don't have tons of HP, but plenty of torque and far stronger transmissions and transfer cases than Heeps.
__________________
2002 Freelander
2000 DII w/CDL
1967 SIIA 109SW
Former Rovers
2004 Modded "S" Disco, R.I.P.
2004 G4 Disco
2002 Modded Freelander
1995 Modded Disco
1994 D-90 #8
1993 NAS D110
1990 Range Rover County
1973 SIII 88
1972 Range Rover 2 door
Muddy Oval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2006, 10:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
Rocky Mountain High
 
Funrover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 9,936
Gallery: 0
Default

With the CDL or viscious coupling.....better traction...Coils provide better flex...lower weight dist.....stout.....etc etc.....I really like the fact I have better visability!!
__________________
Don't Take Life to Serious, You'll Never Get Out Alive

"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from"


Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Colorado's own 'jacked up little kid' is Funrover. And he's usualy in the springs.
Funrover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2006, 10:50 PM   #4 (permalink)
Majesticdisco1
 
disco12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Union City California
Posts: 1,197
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muddy Oval
They have very stout chassis and they carry the vast majority of their weight down low. They don't have tons of HP, but plenty of torque and far stronger transmissions and transfer cases than Heeps.

X2 on that Muddy Oval. They do have very stout chassis and construction systems within the body and safety cage. They also have very strong gearbox and transmissions. Plus they look better than most 4x4's. Thats why Jeeps say we don't understand which in fact we do that's why we drive rovers.
__________________
1996 D1

RTE 3"
33" BFG MUDS
disco12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2006, 11:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
smileyq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 653
Gallery: 0
Default

Man.. I always thought it was because they cost 50k+ Boy I must be missing something
__________________
"Good saddles ain't cheap, and cheap saddles ain't good."
smileyq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2006, 11:22 PM   #6 (permalink)
Roads?...Where we're going, we don't need roads...
 
keptin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,365
Gallery: 0
Default

hey, dont they also have a stock long arm suspension?? If not, those control arms are pretty long.


Keep in mind, as far as similar vehicles (weight, wheelbase, etc) it all comes down to the driver.
__________________
Josh Shapiro
DII
Photos at www.kep1.com
keptin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2006, 02:25 AM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
01001010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 4,509
Gallery: 15
Default

Here come my .02

Down here, everyone is surprised to see me out on the trails but at the same time recognize that the Land Rover is the vehicle to have! Just today someone told me that I would be able to make it through where their H1 got stuck....I did!

So down to the facts...Although some have criticised British Engineering with the D1, its construction is like none other. The drivetrain is made up of a combination of different great systems, for example, the Swivel Ball enclosed CV Joint. The Old Toyota BJs (also legendary) have this same system up front. Coil Sprung suspension. Transmissions and T-cases that are (seems like it to me) nearly indestructale. With sway bars removed, flex is optimal with the right sized tire (everyone has their own definition of this, but I find that 245/75/16 are PERFECT for a D1). With the bumper trimmed, frontal approach angle is GREAT and although the rear could be better, its a lot better than most SUVs.

Another thing that makes the Disco such a great off roader (D1 atleast) is its ability to be serviced out on the field. Its a mix of modern computer controled engine management with classic drivetrain/suspension components.

Another point to consider is that you can comfortably live out of a Disco with the right equipment and all of the survival essentials.

But back to talk about stock rigs, its one of the few SUVs you can literally drive from the dealer to the trails. In the 90's this was so true, being that Land Rover chose Michelin XPCs as the standard tire...it just so happens that this tire is a great AT tire (my opinion).

There are many more specific reasons whyt he Disco is a great off-roader, but I can't think of them right now, my nephew is screamin his lungs out because he doesnt want to go to sleep!

Someone take over...
__________________
JC...

1996 Discovery SE - The Blue Marlin - gone =(
1965 Series IIa 109 RHD Dsl - Wilks


www.TerraTrekker.com
01001010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2006, 07:09 AM   #8 (permalink)
Austin "Danger" Powers
 
FrankyRizzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sin City
Posts: 854
Gallery: 0
Default

Drivetrain components are tucked up in the chassis to keep from getting hung up.
__________________
94 Disco

Make something idiot proof and they will build a better idiot.

FrankyRizzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2006, 07:41 AM   #9 (permalink)
Former NAS LR TECH, Current AUS LR TECH
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DOWN UNDER
Posts: 1,659
Gallery: 0
Default

What makes Land Rovers the best for offroading isnt the design.


Its the fact they are designed to go offroad, All Land Rovers.

They are not adapted to go offroad.

They new vehicles now like Audi and MB have offroad capability air ride vehicles that adapt to offroad conditions. But the question is is adapting a vehicle to somewhat offroad use better or is the designed for adventure better.
Rovin4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 08:39 AM   #10 (permalink)
k12
Senior Member
 
k12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 144
Gallery: 0
Default

I own a 100% stock auto 98 disco and an 89 5 speed 4.2 wrangler. The wrangler has 5 inches of lift and 33/12.5/15 MT tires.

The Disco is WAY smoother on the trails. The Jeep has WAY better approach and departure angles. The Disco has WAY more articulation. The Jeep has a soft top. The Disco has AC, a lazy boy for a seat, and a radio with weather band (but also a front sunroof and rear windows not working). For deep mud, I'd prefer the Jeep (w/current set up). For a long steep hill climb, I'd prefer the Disco. For a boulder field, I'd prefer the Jeep (w/ current set up). For snow up to 14 inches, I'd prefer the Disco (jeep for more due to ground clearance). The Disco can cruise safely and comfortably at 80 mph. The jeep has a hard time getting to 60 mph. BOTH get horrible gas mileage (disco=14-16/ jeep=12 (due to the tires).

The jeep has 250 k and has only needed a new ecu, u joints, carbarator, and wheel hubs (not a joke, that's it besides tires, brakes, cap, rotor, wires and plugs). The Disco (178 k) needs more things with greater frequency (mostly electronic, ha ha).

If I could have only one, . . . I love them both so I'll keep each. I will say this, with a little lift, some bigger MT tires, a locking rear diff, sliders, winch and HD bumbers, the Disco would be the better rig by far.

Let the debate continue!

K
k12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 08:57 AM   #11 (permalink)
Moderator
 
01001010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 4,509
Gallery: 15
Default

K12....good to see you again man!...been a while!
__________________
JC...

1996 Discovery SE - The Blue Marlin - gone =(
1965 Series IIa 109 RHD Dsl - Wilks


www.TerraTrekker.com
01001010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 09:03 AM   #12 (permalink)
Crazy about Rovers and more...
 
RageRover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 2,887
Gallery: 0
Default

Because it is a LR, LOL. They were originally designed for off road use, multi-task vehicle (fire engine, tractor, welder, generator). I just didn't know what I was missing out on when it came to looking at the history of LR. The use of coils, and multilink suspension was the key to a good off road vehicle, at least IMO. I like the idea, with leafs, articulation and ride quality is all there.

Plus the full time 4x4 system makes it superior to anything else, along with the off set pumpkins front and rear (diffs).

Plus aren't these axles on RRCs, D1s and 2s, aren't they the equivalent to like a Dana 60 or something?
__________________
Pat Albaugh, Midwest Moderator

"Diffage" -the point at which the truck's differential makes contact with the ground.

http://www.cardomain.com/id/RageRover42Visit my RRC and others here!(updated as of September 15, 2006)

1995 RRC LWB

-LT265/75R16 Pathfinder All Terrains
-RTE 2" Lift Springs
-Pro Comp ES9000 Shocks (from DAP Enterprises)
-KMC Front Diff Guard
-4 Desert Fox 55 watt Lighting
-Radio Shack CB Radio (never know when signal fails on a cell phone)
-2 Halogen Super Sport 100 watt forward lights
-Brush Gaurd, meant for a Jeep Grand Cherokee, now fitted to the RRC
-Lowe's Special "Homemade" Snorkel
-T-Case out of an 92' RRC
RageRover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2006, 09:40 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Geobloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 808
Gallery: 0
Default

Oooo eck talk about an open ended question, so many great statements already too! Lemme see what I can add...

First off from the day they were concieved way back when the earth was young they were being designed with a purpose in life, not as a fashion accessory. THey were designed to be all things for all men, to plough the fields, carry sheep, travel large distances, cross all terrains, be repairable by even the most inept mechanic in the middle of nowhere with nothing but bailer twine and grease, run on pretty much any combustable liquid, able to tow heavy loads anywhere (have heard stories of farmers happily towing 20+ tons off the back of a D90 200tdi!! )...

...The thing to try and do is not list what they can do but try and list what they can't!! The only thing I can think of is not do 35mpg, but then again thats not what they were designed for!

Yes they have problems, yes they cost a bit to repair (esspecially the newer models), but after all is said and done there are still 75% of all Land Rovers ever built still working and driving around this planet and for me thats what makes the marque so good! Longevity and undeniable ability!
__________________
1992 K-reg 200TDI Defender 90 (Eva)





There are a terrible lot of lies going around the world, and the worst of it is half of them are true.
Sir Winston Churchill
Geobloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 06:25 AM   #14 (permalink)
k12
Senior Member
 
k12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 144
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01001010
K12....good to see you again man!...been a while!

Yeah Man. Been a little while since posting but always stop in for a visit. I have been working some serious hours at work and have been too busy to really post much.

Summer is here and I am getting the Disco ready for a big road trip from PA out to Co and AZ. Def. doing some wheeling up in the San Juans around Ouray/Telluride, etc. May even blast over to Moab for a day. I have so many things to do to the disco to get ready:

change fluids (all)
front d-shaft u joints (already did rears)
front hub bearings (already did rears)
resolder window ecu and sunroof ecu
weld on recovery points to front frame (got 11,000 lbs D rings from Tractor Supply for $5 each!!)
t-stat, hoses, collant temp sensor
tires (going with AT but would prefer MT)
instal rear jump seat (lots of people in the disco)(already put one in)

What's new down in FL? It must be hot already. Any good war stories of late?

K12
k12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 12:34 AM   #15 (permalink)
Majesticdisco1
 
disco12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Union City California
Posts: 1,197
Gallery: 0
Default

Not to mention girls dig Rovers all of my girlfriend friends always commment on how good I look in my lifted Disco. I better be careful don't want to be referee of a catfight.
__________________
1996 D1

RTE 3"
33" BFG MUDS
disco12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Land Rovers Only - Land Rover Forum > Land Rover Model Forums > Discovery Series I



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
All content is copyright © 2004-2008 www.landroversonly.com and its original authors. Land Rovers Only is in no way affiliated with Land Rover