It's not that hard to agree with you when we're on the same track.
Ian, we've had our disagreements going back a number of years and that's a fact. When it comes to repairing these older Range Rovers and Discovery models, I think there is little we disagree on and I would, most often defer to your experience in that regard.
However, because of what I do for a living, it is crucial that I know what parts are on the trucks I deal with. As a result, when I say something like, mid model year '89 starting with a specific VIN, exposed hinges were done away with, that comes from both owning trucks from that model year AND needing to know that type of information for my customers.
The same thing can be said of the spider issue. We narrowed it down to vehicles that would have a 14CUX fuel system and the 10as Lucas alarm box. Now, I can comfortably state that such a system wouldn't appear in an NAS truck. Would five, ten or a hundred DI's destined for the US have a very different wiring system installed to accommodate the 10as, I think not.
It's one thing to talk about oddities like one '93 with a newer VIN having ten splines while an apparently older '93 has 24 splines but that's a matter of pulling something off the shelves. A different wiring harness is something a little more involved for a weird anomaly like a 14CUX/10as DI making it to our shores, especially when you consider how strict our governments regulations are (you even cited them complaining about bolt together frames). OBDII was mandated for '96 and that's precisely why Rover went about installing the unique GEMS system in our trucks. It wasn't the case for the ROW hence the grab bag of various setups in other countries.
I would much prefer that we play nice in this sandbox and respect each other and the particular set of Rover knowledge we bring to the forum rather than have every thread we both are involved in disintegrate into a fight to prove who is right and who is wrong.
Cheers,
Paul